Post by account_disabled on Mar 11, 2024 7:45:36 GMT
The I was immediately concerned about the experimental design. Perhaps Google wasnt recording data for these pages Perhaps we didnt hit a minimum number necessary for recording data only barely eclipsing that in the last study of searches per person Unfortunately neither of those explanations made much sense. In fact several of the test pages picked up impressions by the hundreds for bizarre lowranking keywords that just happened to occur at random in the nonsensical tests. Moreover many pages on the site recorded very low impressions and clicks and when compared with Google Analytics data did indeed have very few clicks. It is quite evident that.
GSC cannot be relied upon regardless of user circumstance for lightly searched Europe Cell Phone Number List terms. It is by this account not externally valid that is to say impressions and clicks in GSC do not reliably reflect impressions and clicks performed on Google. As you can imagine I was not satisfied with this result. Perhaps the experimental design had some unforeseen limitations which a standard comparative analysis would uncover. Comparative analysis The next step I undertook was comparing GSC data to other sources to see if we could find some relationship between the data presented and secondary measurements which might shed light on why the initial GSC experiment had reflected so poorly on the quality of data.
The most straightforward comparison was that of GSC to Google Analytics. Google Analyticss recording of organic clicks from Google if not identically at least proportionally. Because of concerns related to the scale of the experimental project I decided to first try a set of larger sites. Unfortunately the results were wildly different. The first example site received around clicks per day from Google Organic Search according to GA. Dozens of pages with hundreds of organic clicks per month according to GA received clicks according to GSC. But in this case I was able to.
GSC cannot be relied upon regardless of user circumstance for lightly searched Europe Cell Phone Number List terms. It is by this account not externally valid that is to say impressions and clicks in GSC do not reliably reflect impressions and clicks performed on Google. As you can imagine I was not satisfied with this result. Perhaps the experimental design had some unforeseen limitations which a standard comparative analysis would uncover. Comparative analysis The next step I undertook was comparing GSC data to other sources to see if we could find some relationship between the data presented and secondary measurements which might shed light on why the initial GSC experiment had reflected so poorly on the quality of data.
The most straightforward comparison was that of GSC to Google Analytics. Google Analyticss recording of organic clicks from Google if not identically at least proportionally. Because of concerns related to the scale of the experimental project I decided to first try a set of larger sites. Unfortunately the results were wildly different. The first example site received around clicks per day from Google Organic Search according to GA. Dozens of pages with hundreds of organic clicks per month according to GA received clicks according to GSC. But in this case I was able to.